Showing posts with label Word of God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Word of God. Show all posts

Friday, February 8, 2013

Applying Information Science theory to the Word of G-d

As an information scientist, I see that a lot of what I am learning, reading and discovering in my secular studies could very well be applied to understanding Biblical concepts. Take for instance the concept of the Word of God. We in information science have a theory called Shannon's theory of information defines information to a signal sent by a messenger to a receiver. Many times a signal sent is not fully received by the receiver as intended due to the concept called noise. In my view, such a theory can very well be applied to learning about the word of G-d. The Word is the message or information or in Shannon's theory, the signal.
The message or signal is usually carried in a vessel or medium. However, by the signal being carried by a medium, it becomes limited to the constraints of that medium.

For example, in order to convey a message in a book, nonverbal cues get lost. Also, one's act of writing it down, requires it to be expressed in language choices and the system of writing and alphabets, which have a potential to constrain what the writer wants to say to his audience. To explain this, just imagine a man seeing a weird animal that no one has ever seen before. Further, he has no camera to capture what he saw and the experiences he had with the animal. He then has to use language to describe what he saw and his experience. To do so, he has to draw on images and literary devices like similes and metaphors that he and his audience are acquainted with in order to explain and describe his observation and experience. Hence he explains or describes a new thing through use of comparisons to a familiar thing. This is exactly the case with men in the Bible who saw things that we have never seen. Ezekiel, John and Daniel for instance, all saw strange animals. These strange animals they saw, were compared to animals that they were familiar with.

Each medium requires the writer to adapt the signal to the strengths of the medium. For example, in graphic novels, more focus is placed on the visuals and the action taking place in the graphic novel rather than dialogue. As such graphic novels and even movies never tell stories the same way that the traditional printed book does. Hence, something therefore is always lost, when one seeks to convey a message from one medium to another.

The scriptures are the medium that carries the Word of G-d to men. However, what ever God wants to communicate to us gets distorted and a lot of noise comes with the signal and message. Whether it be the limitations of a particular language system or the translation into another language system. Hence, when we final get the message of God, our own understanding and reception will never be perfect. Apostle Paul has this saying that I think could accurately describe what goes on when we read the Bible's message:

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. (1 Corinthians 13:12, KJV)
In the final analysis, the message that God wants to convey to us always comes with distortions that occur within our dimension of time, space and reality. Even, Jesus, the embodied message and word, came with limitations that made him only communicate with few persons (see a previous blog post where I mention this). As such, we as a people must always recognise that when we read the Word of God, we partake in a communication process that is not perfect, and as such need to depend not on our own intellect and training to handle and interpret the message, but also the Holy Spirit, who reveals what it says and inspired the men of old to record the portions that they have recorded. Hence, like the actors of Hollywood, when we approach the Word, message, script or the simply the Bible, we must approach it with the understanding that we need to invite the spirit that summoned the word into being to enable us to read, interpret and receive the message in it for us.

Shalom!

Friday, February 26, 2010

The beginning of the creation of God

I recently received the best explanation of the "mystery of God" from a household Bible study group. For centuries it has puzzled Christians how JESUS could be God, yet be the son of God. The Bible mentions that JESUS is the "firstborn of every creature" and "the beginning of the creation of God".

In Revelation 3:14 (King James Version)it says:
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God;

In the NIV, this concept was so problematic for Christian interpreters that they rendered it:
To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God's creation.

However The Message translation renders it:
Write to Laodicea, to the Angel of the church. God's Yes, the Faithful and Accurate Witness, the First of God's creation, says:

This Christian theologically problematic statement has lead the Jehovah's Witnesses to declare that JESUS is a created being (Watchtower, 2005, para. 10).

Well, in that Bible study on Wednesday night, February 24, 2010, at Milborough, Jamaica, when this passage was read, I raised the point to the group's leader, that obviously, JESUS' existence came from the Father.

I went on to say, that there are only two ways that a person could be a son, either through birth or adoption. G-d declares in the scriptures that someone (who I believe is JESUS) became his son. Psalm 2:7 (King James Version) says:
I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

If Jesus lived independently of the Father prior to creation, then G-d have no need to say "this day have I begotten thee [as my Son]". It would be more reasonable for G-d to say "this day have I adopted thee [JESUS as my son]". However, the first born or begotten obviously implies that one proceeded from the other. Clearly, the person in Psalm 2:7 became G-d's son through birth, or else, the L-RD would have used the term "have adopted thee" in place of "begotten".

I even went on to explain that JESUS is described as the Word (John 1). The Word implies that there is a source. Word can even be translated as message or communication, which implies an author or source. The question:

How can Jesus come from a source yet still be described as the source itself?

Going back to the idea of the word. A word can exist with the source before it is expressed. JESUS was in God before he was expressed by the Father. However, the word can exist in one's mind prior to being expressed or manifested. The message or information that an author wants to communicate or express, could exist within the author or communicator long before it is expressed. This fits well with the description or definition of the Word (logos) as described in Vine, Unger and White (1996) as the "expression of thought" (p. 683).

JESUS therefore existed and was expressed long before anything was created. When G-d spoke the world into existence, His Word brought forth everything. The Word preceded the establishment of the universe and creation. In fact the Word was always present with G-d, and was expressed and reflected in creation. Further its the Word that sustains the current creation and order of the universe. As Hebrews 1:2-3 (King James Version)says:

[G-d] Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;


Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high:

G-d's Word (JESUS), now speaks for him. G-d has nothing else to say or communicate or express outside of his son, the Word that proceeded from him, while existed with him in the beginning. In fact, this word is also the last word or the Amen (Revelation 3:14).

References:


Vine, W. E., Unger, M. F., & White, W. (1996). Vine's complete expository dictionary of Old and New Testament words: With topical index. Nashville: T. Nelson.


Watchtower.(2005). Who is Jesus Christ? What Does the Bible Really Teach? (Chapter 4). WatchTower.org: Jehovah's Witnesses Official Web Site. Retrieved from http://www.watchtower.org/e/bh/article_04.htm